![]() |
When do the prosecutions begin?
|
If you get tickets, save us a few seats...
|
Two weeks ago, it was the just the Dow-Jones.
Now it's more like "We're all baaaaaccccckkk" Wall Street Journal Chris Dieterich and Matt Jarzemsky, 3/15/12 US Stocks Higher After Solid Domestic Economic Data Quote:
|
Great Unemployment rate info here...
|
Classic, I am truly sorry your glass is always half empty.
I do know what unemployment is... Once, I went for 3 1/2 years until I realized that self-employment was to be my way out. But it took a lot of work to even become self-employed. Getting up and staying off my butt was more than a full time job. Outlook is overwhelmingly important, and things are looking up in the US. That's the reason for my postings on the DJ, etc. I won't let the nay-sayers keep pounding on Obama as if there was no bottom. I believe we bottomed out over a year ago, and next year will be much better. So, I am hoping you too will soon find your way through to a "full glass" |
You've completely missed my point, Lamp. Look at the numbers.
Are they improving? Is the U-6 better now than it was? Is it changing more than the U-3? Look at this presidency compared to the last one. Look at the change in U-6 from 2008 to today - do the same for the last administration. I just though it was a neat tool to use for factual comparison. |
Classic, why are you trying to make that comparison ?
The US went through a major financial upheaval in 2008. It happened to happen at the end of GWB's watch. The recovery has happened to happen on Obama's watch. It's not hard to understand that the U6 and U3 were relatively constant before 2008. It's not hard to understand that the U6 and U3 went up after 2008. Likewise, it's not hard to understand that the U6 and U3 takes quite a while to come down. Maybe it's not as fast as some would want it to be.. But by the very definition of U6 and U3, it is what it is. If your point is something else, please explain in more detail. . |
I wasn't looking at the rates themselves, I was looking at the percentage changes.
|
???
Sorry, I'm not getting it... |
arggghhhh - nevermind.
|
OK, I'll really try once more to see what you want me to see.
When I open your link and change the years to 1994 - 2012.... I see the U6 curve drop from 12% at a relatively smooth rate, then in 2001, it bounces up from 7% up to 10%, then gradually falls in 2005 - 2007, and then skyrockets in 2009. Since 2010, the U6 seems to have dropped from 17% down to 15%. The U3 follows the same shape, but the %'s are smaller... about half. Other than an annoying musical ad about St Patricks Day sales, what else should I be seeing ? |
The U-6 has fallen at a greater % than the U-3.
Based upon the economic situation from 2008, I believe this is a better indicator of the unemployment rate. I'm certainly not seeing it here, but statistically things are apparently better. |
NY Times
By JESSICA SILVER-GREENBERG Published: April 1, 2012 As Foreclosure Problems Persist, Fed Seeks More Fines Quote:
|
Still waiting on those prosecutions...
|
and the glass is still half empty
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.