![]() |
I think that "turd association" is still flatulating along...he could try that.
|
Quote:
|
Alrighty there, you old moggy.
|
sorry i'm late
one test, level 7, coming up. and ,Radar, let the new guy answer this time.
eh hem. gotcher pencil? 1. What ryhmes with 'Orange'? 2. What one thing would you buy with $256,000? C. What one thing would you buy with $7? IV. Marry, Kill, Fuck: Penny Marshall, Roseanne Barr, Rosie O'Donnell 5. Who do you hate more, the Dallas Cowboys or the NY Yankees? 6. When was the last time you had an enema? 7. Ever seen your mom naked? 8. Would you rather permanently travel 500 years into the past, or the future? IX. Which one of the Indigo Girls is queer? ten. How many fingers am I holding up right now? |
Quote:
1. 2. C. IV. 5. 6. 7. 8. IX. As per the instructions given by Professor Elspode, I have used my finest no. 2 pencil and written my answers clearly and neatly on my 19" computer display. Did I pass? :worried: . |
With flying colors. :thumbsup:
|
Oh great, another smartass... just what we need.
|
man, another brilliantly composed test wasted. oh, and you missed number ten. I'm sorry, I'll have to give you an 'incomplete'
|
Quote:
ten. Note: Of course the above answer depends upon one's definition of "now." The value I have given in response to question (ten) was arrived at through the application of noncommutative geometry as an alternative hidden structure of Kaluza-Klein theory. This means that one leaves space-time as it is and one modifies only the extra dimensions; one replaces their algebra of functions by a noncommutative algebra, usually of finite dimension to avoid the infinite tower of massive states of traditional Kaluza-Klein theory. Because of this restriction and because the extra dimensions are purely algebraic in nature the length scale associated with them can be arbitrary, indeed as large as the Compton wave length of a typical massive particle. The algebra of Kaluza-Klein theory is therefore, for example, a product algebra of the form: A = C(V ) ⊗Mn. Normally V would be chosen to be a manifold of dimension four, but since much of the formalism is identical to that of the M(atrix)-theory of D-branes. For the simple models with a matrix extension one can use as gravitational action the Einstein-Hilbert action in ‘dimension’ 4+d, including possibly Gauss-Bonnet terms. For a more detailed review, please refer to my lecture at the 5th Hellenic school in Corfu. |
NEWS FLASH!
Schroedinger's Cat hocks up Quantum Hairball...see previous post! :eek: |
Quote:
|
Personally, I always stick to the following: X=Y when the prism of mount Etna falls on a tuesday. I've lived my life by that rule!
|
Quote:
Corfu, huh?...I didn't see you there. I must have been at the Bills game. :rolleyes: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.