Quote:
Originally Posted by mitheral
Quote:
Originally Posted by LabRat
... Ugh, I'd have to get a whole new computer, mine is WAY old, like, the HD is 2G. Totally ancient.
|
Even an ancient P166 will run Win98SE and Firefox (my home box) fast enough to surf the cellar. It's not this is one of those bloated flash navigation sites. Put behind a firewall/router like the WRT54G and with up to date virus definitions and your as safe as your ever going to be connected to the world.
|
This is posted from a 486 66 Mhz machine. However if I was running Windows98, the machine would run too slow. This machine runs Windows NT 4.0 which is why 66 Mhz remains sufficiently fast.
In another discussion was an assumption that their automobile needs hundreds of horsepower. 100 Horse is still too small? Tim Allen's Home Improvement was making a joke of these people: "More power". Amazing that without massive power, drivers start learning driving techniques. Same concept advocates teenagers have a horsepower restriction on their driver's license.
A computer with a 2G hard drive has more than plenty of computing power to access The Cellar. Also why pilots first train on low power aircraft. This is why better pilots are also glider pilots. Its called first learning your limitations; developing skills accordingly. First learning the skills of flying rather than use "more power" to mask bad piloting skills. A computer 'power user' would know these 'ancient' machines are still sufficient - and learn from the experience.
Over there is another 66 Mhz 486 from HP. It has one speed advantage over this 486 and a 500 Mhz Gateway running Windows 98SE - a significantly faster video subsystem. How can this be? They both have the same or less Mhz? Appreciate why so many clone machines are, in reality, less powerful.
Ask yourself if Tim Allen's joke about "more power" was pointed directly at yourself. Even 500 Mhz was more than sufficient power for most internet and other functions. Experienced computer users would know this ... and the reasons why.
Good reason why I went from DOS directly to NT - bypassed Windows 3.1 and Windows 9x. Learned from using what others 'assumed' were obsolete machines. Machines declared obsolete too often by hype rather than by fact.
|