Bush, of course, had nothing to do with it.

:lol:

You're such a patsy.

The "rich" already pay the majority of income taxes that support the poor. Maybe you didn't hear.

What's rich anyway?

Really? That's not what I have read.

Yeah, and you wish to do away with that.

Because the rich will be grateful. Or something.

:lol:

No, because everyone will pay their fair share and the loop holes would be eliminated. Pretty obvious you haven't read much about it. You really should try reading some of it and stop getting your information from George Soros and Huffington Post.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

You really ARE a sucker.

For a better tax system? You betcha.

Because of course they didn't figure out how to fuck you before they proposed it.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

No, really. Do you know what your tax rate would have to be, if the mode income carried the same rate as the highest income?

Do you even know what the mode income IS these days? Of course you don't. Limbaugh and Boortz told you what to think, and here you are.

Mode is not really all that important in this plan.

So it's a plan now?

HAW HAW!

No, mode is only the unadjusted income that most Americans make (as opposed to average income).

No, that would hardly be important under a "fair tax".

:lol:

Silly me, thinking you'd know what "mode" means in the first place.

You are right it is not important. Everyone pays the same, regardless of income. The only fair tax plan is one where everyone pays in equally in relation to the income made.

So you're basically forcing the middle class into the working class, the working class into the lower class, and the lower class onto the street....And you approve of this rampant buggering you are DEMANDING that you receive, so that Warren Buffet can afford another layer of gold on his yacht.

You're a sheep of the first order, Merc. :lol:

Man you have some serious delusions there. There is no evidence that any of those fantasies you have are going to occur under a fair tax plan.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Of course not. The fact that Merc can't do simple math notwithstanding.

:lol:

So far you have posted no math to support your dispute.

Neither have you.
Besides, since when have any government numbers added up?

Neither have you.
Besides, since when did government numbers ever add up?

Follow the links simpleton.

You didn't answer my question.
Also, maths means squat, quite frankly.

The mode income of United States citizens is $19,980/year.

So tell me...what percentage of income would you like to hit with your "fair" tax that would still provide $2.6 trillion per year?

If you have another reliable source for data let us all in on it. All numbers are controlled by some body or organization. So the answer to your question is sure they add up. For those adding them. It doesn't mean you have to believe them. Let me get you a tin foil hat to go with your buddy.

...Bearing in mind that every working American's share would be $17,333.

So most working Americans get to try to live on $2,500/yr, so Merc's heroes can crap on solid gold toilets.

I guess you never took statistics in college. Mode is a poor indicator when you have such extremes. Like your buddy said, who is going to believe your numbers?

You want to give me a tin foil hat? I'm not the one posting "lol obama" obsessively.

There's a difference between adding up, and making sense, also.

you obviously did not read about it.

That's cool.

The BLS, for one, because that's where I got the numbers.

Mode is the ONLY important number, when you consider a flat or "fair" tax, because that's where most of your money will come from.

Have you EVER taken a basic math class? Ever? This is simple division we're talking about here.

But Boortz tells you everything is fine, so it's fine. Right?

:lol:

Probably approximately the same number that'll believe yours.

You obviously never checked any of the numbers for yourself.

:lol:

Just keep on believing, hippie.

:lol:

According to whom? You? Now you have not really proven to be a reliable source.

First a "neocon", now a "hippie". Damm you are fickle bird.

And you're a Koolaid-guzzling sheep.

Your point?

What? You've never heard of the BLS?

http://www.bls.gov

Lightweight.

A neocon hippie koolaid-guzzling sheep? Wow this just keeps getting better. :lol2:

You are one angry person.

I just love the way you pick up on the smallest details, while somehow ignoring the obvious questions.

Did they teach you that at school?

I thought you didn't trust the government? So now you are going to quote the stats that you like?

Naw, he figured that one out watching Rush Limbaugh.

What can you expect?

And your source got its numbers from...oh, yeah, Boortz's ass.

Simple observation. Really not that hard. It comes from the boredom and apathy of reading these posts.

Really? That sounds like a tw quote.

And the sheer pain of having your arse OWNED when you try to pass Boortz off as actual journalism.

Ah. So why do you still do it?

I call 'em how I see 'em. You're a dittohead.

Really?:3_eyes:

That another funny one. :lol2:

Apparently so.

Unless your argument is that Boortz has been meticulously tracking employment information for the last 30 years.

Hey, you enjoy yourselves.

It's kinda sad, really.

I don't get it.

It's okay if you run.

Most of the sissies do.

:)

But... But... We were ganging up on him, obviously.

:lol:

Wait, wait.... wait for it.


Neocon hippie Koolaid-guzzling sheep sissy. Man you got one imagination. You think all that up your self or did someone help you? Just wondering.:D

Republicans always whine like that.

Quit your whimpering, Merc. You sound like a sniveling little bitch.

Ooooo a new one! now it is your lable of:


"Neocon hippie Koolaid-guzzling sheep sissy sniveling little bitch"

Man you are on a roll! :D

Jesus fucking Christ. And I thought you had a spine. And a brain, briefly.

It really is great entertainment. Really.

Ah. Isn't there sumfink on the TeeVee?

You could also go out behind your trailer and watch the bug zapper. :)