Please vote for my friend KELLY - hottest bartender
 

spam

that looks like a fun place

if he hadn't spent a month pissing everyone off first i met call spam, but he's been through the fire and is still here, so we'll just call this a shill.

That depands how many other places he's posted it.

dude, she's totally not the hottest. in fact, she's the 2nd not hottest. Don't get me wrong, she looks filthy dirty, and while that's certainly hot, in the classic sense of the term, she is well eclipsed by chloe.

And sweet Melissa...:sweat:

who is so *into* the camera she's pouring the drink on the floor...

Yeah, but she's the one who promised to boink him if he got her elected. :-)

i think melissa is the cutest ;)

oops, oh yeah. i totally meant mellissa. chloe looks like a psycho. as does kay.....but kay looks like she could kick your ass.

i think you mean "May" lj :p she looks like a man woman on that...what was it called....warrior princess show. Xena??

man, you're right. i give up. i just cant get it right in this thread.

Her dream role is a 12-year-old girl? That's... a little creepy.

Which obviously means she was so cute that they overlooked her lack of skills. This is known as the 'Baywatch' effect.:D

So don't 'Man Rules' state that we must vote for her in order to help him out?

What you mean "we", Kemo Sabe?

You're not talking about Kelly. that's some whore that can't hit the glass.

Kelly really is my friend, and i don't believe this thread is spam. Also. I don't believe I spent my first month or... even a day pissing anyone off. Or better said, I wasn't trying to piss anyone off, I just was trying to make people laugh. That's all I do. Margaret wants to see spam where there isn't. If you had a friend that was in a competition online, I'd vote for him/her because we have this message-board relationship. That's if you had a friend.

:purple nerple:

This post I can't argue with.

I have lots of friends...because I don't presume on the relationships to stuff a ballot box in what's supposed to be a friendly honest competition.

So...you're actually telling us you didn't post that link to all your other hangouts? because if you did, that's spam.

I posted it everywhere I interact because I care about my friend. I don't care what you think spam is. I'm not "actually telling you" anything other than "please vote for my friend Kelly". Why do you have to attack me EVERY TIME you see me post??? My God... if you have "lots of friends", sit back, think of them, and smile. The fact that I have lots of friends makes me NOT want to lash out at someone like you. Thank God for them, and I hope you have a good day.

I normally try to keep out of the drama here, but i must say that your continuous attacks on Steve only make you look bad maggie.

Steve is a very nice man and I would be proud to hang with him any day.

Thanks, Chey. You know I don't take any of this message board stuff to heart. But sometimes when I think about "why people are the way they are" I do have to say to myself... "UNFUCKINGBELIEVABLE".

Hope you're having a great day too!

Continuous?

Haven't said anything about Stevebsjb for weeks. Then I said *one* word: "spam", and he's all flamed up again...and then follows with how having a bunch of friends makes him not want to lash out. What a load of hooey.

It's spam. What he "believes" dosen't change that, even if he's a "nice man".

continous as in... you mostly (and i say "mostly" because i wish not to spend my life tracking all of his or your posts to see just how many you have slagged him off in). you only wish to find fault with him. who fucking cares if YOU consider a friendly gesture for his friend spam. have you no life?? jebuz....

and i might add.... his comment about him not wanting to lash out goes far beyond what you are thinking. believe me.... he HAS held his tongue like a true gentleman!






and you are welcome My Friend :)

Spam asking people to stuff a ballot box isn't a "friendly gesture" to the other contestants...and all this heat is because I called him on it.

Tough.

ok, i will say it.

shut the fuck up maggie for god sake just shut the fuck up!


*goes outside to live what i call life* *suggests you get one*

What you "believe" doesn't matter as much as what I "believe" doesn't matter. The "heat" isn't that I posted asking for the support of a friend, the heat is: why do you have to "call people" on things? Why is your perspective on life skewed this way? You haven't said anything about me in weeks because i haven't posted much in weeks. But when I do there you are in attack mode. I don't care beyond the fact that you make me wonder, why would you want to attack people so much here? I couldn't be a friend with someone like you; if the way you act online is indicative of how you are face-to-face. For example, if you can't connect the dots... if you were my friend, and we were in a park together, sitting and talking, and I said, "Oh, hey, could you please check out this website and vote for my friend Kelly? She's awesome, love that girl, it'd be cool if she won this." would you say "Spam" with a discerning attitude?

You'd get the same reaction from me... "unfuckingbelievable" and then I'd wish you a good day.

Not at all the same thing, although it would be just as much of a presumption--on a single friendship rather than leveraging the many eyeballs of a heavily trafficked website.

Now it's time for you to trot out that tired old excuse about how "it doesn't matter" because "it's only a message board", right?

This is The Cellar. If you want something to be immune from commentary, don't post it here.

I don't mind commentary as I've said. Again, it's the fact that you seem to enjoy attacking others here, it makes me wonder why you are like that.

And I think that you think your version of the world is the only one that matters. You make me sad, actually.

Gee, sounds like an attack to me :-) Anyway, I know exactly why you are like that.
Yes...your deeply sympathy is palpable. Sorry about your inability to handle pushback without whining...and my failure to give your "version of the world" the consideration you think it deserves is tragic too.

But don't worry: after all, "it's only a message board".

I don't worry or whine. I wonder. It's only words on a screen, but thinking about why other people prefer to spread illwill is something I will probably continue to do.

Don't feel special, Maggie rags on everyone. :lol:

hehehe... i know

Actually I only rag on people who I think deserve it, when I think they do. It's just that some people rate it more often than others.

Sometimes I can't help but think a lot of the AG refugees would be happier on MySpace or something like that. Then they'd only have to listen to people who are sucking up to them.

Yeah, but you Margaret are the one that seems to "rate it more than others." Glass houses, and all that.

Well, that's "your version of the world". It's not "the only one that matters", right? It's just the one where the original post was "just a friendly gesture" rather than "spam trying to stuff a ballot box".

That relativism stuff cuts both ways.

Right, but I react to your attacks; whereas you always like to get your digs in (what I call an attack). That's the difference to me. I am not an attacker. I don't want to police the board, but I will comment on your need to spread illwill when you "attack" me.

I don't criticize your posts, but you like to criticize mine. Just live and let live.

Of course you do. But it's OK when you do it.

If I do it's only in reaction to your need to get first blood. I never go after anyone first. There's 100's of people that I've talked with here (dozens, maybe?) that I just have fun with. But you come into my threads and insult, so I will in my own way shoot it right back at you. But I don't ever go into your threads looking to attack you first.

I am sorry that you do not have enough confidence in your friend to allow her to win on her own merits.

Although, based on the other ladies' pictures, your girl's merits aren't quite stacking up, no matter how good a martini she pours.

See? It is OK when you do it, in your "version of the world".

You don't own threads...they're not "your threads" or "my threads"; they are The Cellar. When I say you're spamming and trying to stuff a ballot box, you can feel "insulted" if you want, but it's simple truth; blaming me for pointing it out doesn't change anything. And claiming a halo because you want to paint it as an "act of friendship" is disingenuous.

I don't feel insulted. Stop thinking I am worried, or insulted, or that I am whining. All I am is wondering what would make someone step into a thread on a message board with intent of making that other person feel bad. WONDER - not that I feel slighted, I am just recognizing that you don't care that you may be insulting to others.

All of those women look like road whores.


not really. But they all have high levels of "meh", particularly for attention whores.

*shrug*

If you're spamming or otherwise being lame, you can expect to hear about it.

Your feelings about it are your problem.

What is meh?





@ steve & maggie.

I read tried to read this thread. It was very boring. No swearing or calling names.*yawn* If you'all going to attack and flame please make it interesting. :p

An expression of indifference.

thanks

Sorry...most lameness is inherently boring. Since the spam is already spammed, and anybody who cares about the hottest bartender contest has already voted, all that's left is Steve whining about how he's being mistreated again. :-)

Of course this is the cellar. All's fair in ......love and war.


So like war who told the AGers they would be greeted as liberators and you all would throw flowers at their feet?


ah maggie. I understand your cronystic tendecies. ( cronyistic = is that a real word? )

@Steve, don't take it so hard. Maggie is actually mild and smart to boot. This is nothing. This is no abuse at all.

Steve, if you post something I consider spam, a painting I think is ugly or a poem I think is stupid, do you think I should follow the "if you don't have something nice to say, don't say anything at all", rule, for fear of offending you? :confused:

Bruce, Steve is not on about that at all. What I believe he is trying to say is that maggie seems to be an angry troll with an internet vengeance against her real life reality. No life....angry....easy to slag off people on the net to payback all the crap we all know she must have received as a child and still yet as an adult. 'Tis easy to cast stones and argue when not face to face.

For four years I have seen Steve take 1,000 times worse trollism’s than Maggie tosses. No matter how hard you try and break him Maggie (referring to “it’s only an internet community”) you won’t achieve your goal. Far worse than you have tried.

Of course he is. He wants to deflect attention from what I said by calling me names. It's called an ad hominem.

There's no point in him engaging what I said, because it's true. My "real life reality" is doing just fine...in fact I'm not spending it in hanging out in bars in Manhattan. It happens to include hanging out on the Cellar...where we've seen trolls before and know what real ones look like.
So then this shouldn't bother him at all.

:eek: * gasp * no way. Of couse I havn't seen him post in a year.




About trolls. I don't think maggie is trolling. She is just wenching.

Many (perhaps most) people, labelled "trolls", are simply being called thus by someone else in the course of a religious, political or other ordinary type of dispute; in other words, they are labelled as one for acting as a dissident or heretic.



ok I looked up the definition. This is interesting.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll

Vicious circles

For many people, the characterising feature of trolling is the perception of intent to disrupt a community in some way. Inflammatory, sarcastic, disruptive or humorous content is posted, meant to draw other users into engaging the troll in a fruitless confrontation. The greater the reaction from the community the more likely the user is to troll again, as the person develops beliefs that certain actions achieve his/her goal to cause chaos. This gives rise to the often repeated protocol in Internet culture: "Do not feed the trolls."
Often, a person will post a sincere message about which he is emotionally sensitive. Skillful trolls know that an easy way to upset him is to falsely claim that he is a "troll." In forums where most users are similar to each other, outsiders may be perceived as trolls simply because they do not fit into the social norms of that group. It can sometimes be difficult to distinguish between a user who merely has different values, views, or ideas, and a user who is intentionally trolling. This can lead to genuinely hostile behavior, including flame wars.




According to this definition calling someone a troll especially an established member of a group is called trolling as well. :eek:


So again I say. She is not being a troll. Steve is a grown up he can deal with her annoyance.

Ghod, that *never* happens here. :-)

I rate this thread a 2.

It started out a 2 because Steve asked us to vote in this lame bartender contest. Steven please, don't start some lame-ass thread to get your lame-ass bartender some lame-ass vote whoring, which is just about the lamest thing the Internet is used for,... and then get all mad because someone called it lame.

It went up to a 5 when LJ pointed out that Kelly was dirtyish but not hot and this led to an actual discussion of the tenders.

Then it went to a 2 when it disintegrated into the usual thread about everybody, instead of about any topic in particular, which led to the insanely predictable side-taking and chucking of spears.

Have you got nothing but drama to share? Shuddup all you fux, and start some threads which are really cool.

:love:

I think I'm gonna like it now that UT is one of 'us', and not a mod anymore:D

fux.

Bwa ha ha ha!

priceless ;) Gotta admit, I got into the threaqd when the spears started flying. Why s that always so interesting? Maybe it's just me..........