![]() |
Dear Cellar
I think we need a Dear Abby thread, but, instead of one Abby, the advice could come from many Cellarites.
It could be interesting. What do you think? |
Ethical?
I'll go first.
Dear Cellar, An independent engineering consultant that I've worked on a project with for a few years made me this offer: If I refer any new work to him, he'll send 10% of any money he makes from that job back to me as a referral fee. That means, since he makes $150/hr, that I would get $15 for each hour that he works on that project, for doing essentially nothing. Do you feel that this is ethical? Signed HLJ |
It depends--is he less qualified than other people you might otherwise give the work to?
|
No, but it makes the Bush folks proud. :bolt:
|
Quote:
Dear HLJ, In the contracting world, not only is this not unethical...it is standard practice and highly beneficial to you. Your world, just optimized. I'm really surprised that you have been referring clients for free...but hey..just do it. You may also do that when you need work from people that are over-loaded and bogged down, or...they hate that client (want to fire their client for personal reasons) but don't want to just give them away. So they give them to someone known for a referral fee. Oh and...this is not illegal if you were wondering. We have an entire dept. based on all the referrals here, so it is someones job to facillitate and keep track of all of them. Signed, The Cellar Cicero ps...I would just wait for the whole job to finish and cut from the net instead of money per hour. |
Would doing this violate any 'Standards of Integrity' policy's that your current employer has in place?
If so...weigh your options. |
Quote:
|
Dear Cellar,
Thanks for the feedback. I guess there are two different situations: 1) I refer client to "Bob" and Bob pays me a referral fee; 2) I hire or contract with Bob and Bob pays me a fee. Situation 1 is perfectly normal, legal, etc. Situation 2 is not. Is this how you see it? |
Quote:
Now if you were to deal with referrals outside of company time, based on business dealings off company time, off company property (phones, computers, blackberry's, etc...) then there is no problem. IMHO there MUST be a clear delineation between what you do and profit from at work for personal gain, and what your work environment is expecting you to do for them on personal time. That includes any and all expectations of monetary reimbursement based upon business dealings with the said previous company on company time. IMHO, you are walking an ethical and potentially legal tightrope... |
Quote:
So if Company A calls me and says, "We're looking for a someone who can do XXX permitting," and I say, "Call 'Bob,' I've worked with him in the past and he's always done a good job," I'm helping out Company A, thereby incurring their good will (assuming 'Bob' does a good job) and potentially bringing in future jobs for us. I'm also helping Bob by bringing him work. In addition, I get paid the same if I work 40 hours per week or 60 hours per week, and I almost always work more than 40 hours per week, so if I spend a few minutes on the above scenario it's not costing the company anything. In other words, there is no clear delineation between company time and personal time. |
Weren't some university Student Loan advisers recently hurt by this sort of thing?
IIRC, they were suggesting certain loan companies over others. Companies that used them as consultants from time to time. It's not exactly the same situation, but it's close enough to make feel iffy about it. |
Dear Ethical,
If he has to "bid" the job along with others and he gets it, there's should be no problem. What he does with his money is entirely up to him. |
Perry Winkle, that was my first thought. The student loan fiasco has been a nightmare. Though most FA administrators are ethical (to the point of it being painful) it takes a few situations like that to dirty the whole system in the eyes of the world. A dirty business in the eyes of the world is not successful, whether it's fair or not.
They've even gone so far as to tell us that we must avoid the "perception" of impropriety and that we will be viewed as guilty until proven innocent. This is a slap in the face for so many hard-working and honest people, but that's the result of less than ethical business deals. Of course, huge companies are built on less than ethical. Ethics sometimes come with a personal price in terms of monetary or related gains, but having a clear conscience is a much better way to go through life. Just my two cents from another side of the issue. Of course, my situation involves federal funding, and we are obligated to uphold the integrity of the programs. But, you wouldn't have asked if it didn't give you some sort of creepy-crawly feeling. |
Quote:
On the referal situation I think that is entirely a different situation. People do that all the time. You just don't want to be in a situation where someone could accuse you of using company contacts for personal ($$$) gain that had not been previously santioned by the company. :2cents: |
Ethics? Ithn't it in England, near Thuthics and Middlethics?
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.