![]() |
Women Are Not Equal
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You men who are just brushing this off, reading the article will make you feel superior, more macho and less pussy whipped. :haha: |
Quote:
|
As with any serious protest, in this case the women's march, there will be the very small minority with "pink va-jay-jay hat on your head and screaming profanities and bashing men." I'd guess less than 5% out of multi-millions, but they will get the attention of the media. That doesn't make the cause any less just.
The same with any protest marches, there will always be a tiny minority damaging property and getting all the attention. So she doesn't think American women should progress until the rest of the word catches up? American women shouldn't lead by example? |
Newbie here, but good grief what a polemic! You guys seem interesting at least. I've been checking out the Image of the Day for a while now and finally decided to officially sign up. Never been much good at lurking anyhow.
|
Welcome! We are an eclectic bunch and 'interesting' is one of the least of the things we are. We are so much more!
Make yourself comfortable, pull up a chair, Jim used to administer the quiz, but I think that has been waived. |
Quote:
the dog ate it! :p: |
Quote:
I'm confused by your statement... which ain't hard :o Are you referring to one of the quoted articles or one of the posts, all, none of the above? We're an opinionate bunch, and willing to "share" our opinions. But it's not personal, "attacks" aren't directed at the person (except in a few cases cough tw cough), but to make my point, and shout down the dumb bastard who doesn't agree with me. :haha: Seriously though, stick around and jump it anytime you like, I'm sure you have things to contribute. |
Classic, of course you are right to quote Brandi's opinion in full. There are, indeed, many countries where women are worse off, far worse off than they are in the States. But not one of those points negates what Dina Leygerman says.
|
Quote:
It does attenuate the self aggrandizement of women vying for importance by associating themselves with pioneers of equality rather than sedulous hard work. In the quoted response, Dina Leygerman doesn't mention any men to be thankful to. Of course, she's a woman and men aren't the association of opportunity. It's almost as though Brandi Atkinson's post was meant to bring out the superficiality of some in the movement. That can be healthy for any grass roots effort. |
There's no reason to trivialize the March or the Movement, which she totally does. The Women's March, which had nearly a whole world's participation, was about much more than just the women who participated. It keeps the discussion going about preserving womens rights as well as all basic human rights The womens March page explains it best.
And it is definitely a protest against Trump. |
Until protests turn into votes, it's marginalized.
|
Marginalized by some, but it also communicates to others that their experiences and feelings, which have been suppressed by people saying, "that's normal", "that's life", and "that the way the world works", are valid.
It lets them know that millions of others feel the same way, they are not alone. |
Rattling their sabers, preaching to the choir. They didn't convince one single person who didn't vote in the last Presidential election to go out and vote in consonance with their cause. Couldn't have been very important. :p:
(bet you had to think about that one) |
You can't know that yet.
|
But the preaching to the choir was just the performance. The message to the rest is conveyed by the media, and social media, on both sides of the issue.
What about the 40% who didn't vote, would they if this issue was a referendum on the ballot? Is this "the" issue which would spur them in action? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.