Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce
Quote:
Originally Posted by sexobon
That means there there are two people who have managed to get fraudulently registered (deceived, bribed, hacked?)
|
You're making an assumption that it was intentional and it was their doing. |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sexobon
Of course, my address on those applications could have been just a typo; but, I wanted to tell my wonderful story on this Sunday afternoon.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce
Yes I saw your size 1 white print, that makes it worse.
|
It means I recognized there was more than one possible assumption of which I chose one for the sake of argument. No one has demonstrated that the one I chose couldn't be the correct one.
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce
Quote:
Originally Posted by sexobon
The post office delivers based upon name, not address; ...
|
This is untrue, I get mail delivered to my address with other peoples names on it. |
|
I wasn't talking about all mail. I was talking about mail-in ballot applications. This is what I actually said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by sexobon
The post office delivers based upon name, not address; so, those applications were never delivered to me...
|
This is evidenced by the fact that the post office did
NOT deliver to me mail-in ballot applications with other people's names and my address.
The distinction is that the post office had a specific reason to the contrary. Delivering them could create a voting discrepancy. There are other items they deliver based upon name too.
[EMPHASIS MINE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce
You're creating a story on false assumptions and a lie.
|
No, your critiquing what I wrote without reading comprehension and keeping things in context.