Quote:
Originally posted by Clodfobble
Alright, I'm probably gonna get reamed for this, but hey, I appreciate a good reaming if you can genuinely provide a persuasive argument counter to mine...
Why does this society not place any responsibility on the choice a single woman makes to keep her baby? That is, standard scenario goes along the lines of 1.) Woman gets pregnant 2.) Woman decides not to give baby up for adoption 3.) Child support payments from father ensue for the next 18 years. Why is it a given that women may decide step #2 without any input from the father, but then he must pay for it for the next 18 years?
Obviously, a man should not be able to force a woman to give the baby up for adoption, but shouldn't his opinion be valid? I think that if a man wishes to not have the child, he should be precluded from both visitation and child support payments. Then it is up to the mother to decide whether she will CHOOSE to be a single parent, or whether she will choose to give the baby up for adoption.
The deadbeat dads of the world aren't paying their child support anyway, and the good dads would be paying because they'd want to know their kids.
There, I said it. Go on now, tell me why I'm wrong.
|
Not wrong, not at all.
However, what's the end result? His opinion would be give up the baby, her opinion is that she'd rather keep it (for whatever reason). So, if we went by
HIS opinion (of not wanting the baby), he gets out of paying support and if we went by HER opinion (wanting to keep the baby), he
STILL gets out of paying support????
Sorry fellas: you don't want kids, wrap that shit up TIGHT! (or get that golden snip) And ladies, you know what to do too!!!.
