View Single Post
Old 07-21-2004, 10:17 AM   #9
Troubleshooter
The urban Jane Goodall
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC
Which goes to show that what's beneficial to the military is not necessairly beneficial to the society from whcne they came and into which they will eventually be returned
Not necessarily. The ability to keep a defensive vanguard on hand, even after they muster out is a good idea.

You have to figure out what you want to change, and what you don't want to change. Changing the ability to kill is very difficult, changing the ability to kill discriminately might not be so difficult. Kill or don't kill is a strong set of absolutes. Open a wide window when you they are being sent into the theater and then all you have to do is teach a very narrow window of boxhood when you return them to the states.

The long term benefits for the military personell is good as well. They are given a cohesive and concrete ideology within which to protect themselves from some of the guilt of their actions as well as a way to control the tension levels.
__________________
I have gained this from philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law. - Aristotle

Last edited by Troubleshooter; 07-21-2004 at 10:21 AM. Reason: More came to me...
Troubleshooter is offline   Reply With Quote