You seem to be missing the point I made above so I will try to clarify. Since you missed it entirely, we are not correctly using the systems we got currently.
This is not about protection as a solution at this point the crap has done left the horse.
After the fraud is discovered, is what I am talking about.
The only place else to go with that is to go to DNA, and the science is NOT perfected on that.
Retinal scanners and fingerprints fail because people will just steal eyes and prints from dead people or live ones for that matter.
There is never going to be a system that is 100% fool proof.
So you have a straw argument nothing can satisfy.
First you chastise me as complaining about the problem and not offering any solutions and then you want to pick apart the solutions.
You paint me wil a broad brush like joe hick consumer.
People like you are the reason nothing ever gets fixed.
You don't know what I personally have demanded or not demanded in law, congressional hearing, congressional office or otherwise and it is arrogant to assume you do.
This thread demostrates nothing about the identity protection system desired. At least on my part.
|