I agree completely. I didn't mean the above posts to imply this "PROVES" creation, but instead, poke more holes in ET.
One of the posts before, from wolf's link, says that if you can disprove a theory, you have to throw that theory out and start over.
How many holes do people have to poke before we should say it's not a good theory?
__________________
Impotentes defendere libertatem non possunt.
"Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth."
~Franklin D. Roosevelt
|