So, just to clarify, Bush says to Putin:
"Hey, here's a thought - it would be a good idea if maybe you didn't seize dictatorial control of the Duma in a bloodless coup, shut down any dissenting voices in the media, and nationalize the most successful companies in your country. It's just this crazy-ass notion I have that balance of power, freedom to dissent, and free markets are essential for democratic institutions to succeed."
This has your panties in a wad how? Seriously, what is it that's bugging you? Either you think:
1) Putin's actions are insignificant or appropriate, and don't warrant comment, or
2) Putin's actions are dangerous and ultimately destabilizing to Russia, but we shouldn't point this out in any way because then they might not like us.
I think Bush's actions were measured and well delivered. It mirrors the interaction we've established with China; measured comments against human rights violations, but progressive movement toward stabilized economic relationships and international cooperation.
-sm
|