|
The artist's description is the kind of pseudo-intellectual nonsense that gives "modern art" a bad name, as is the unimaginative quality of the piece itself.
The description is as incomprehensible as the piece is tasteless, and yet the reader is left with a feeling of inferiority for not "getting it".
Would I be out of line to assume that this is precisely what the "artist" intended?
__________________
I am a living contradiction, ever shifting in the pursuit of truth and fairness.
|