Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lookout123
but if a nominee fits the profile that the white house believes is the best person for the job - wouldn't they be mistaken in NOT putting them back before the committee?
|
No, because the nominations already lost. There is no reason to expect the results to be different this time unless you use the nuclear option to destroy the rules. As a hypothetical, let's assume that the nuclear option vote fails and the judges are again rejected. Whould Bush be mistaken if he didn't put them up for a vote for a third round? Should Clinton have renominated all of his rejected nominations?