View Single Post
Old 07-18-2005, 04:41 PM   #27
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad
Let's be fair R. 358 MW from Cromby, of which I was thankfully unaware, and 2400 MW from Limerick... probably nets out to the Cellar's non-peak-usage sources being about 87% nuclear, 13% coal/oil/gas. I regret the error.
Don't feel too bad about Cromby.
Quote:
Sulfur Dioxide

Since the early 1980s, the company’s Eddystone and Cromby coal burning units in suburban Philadelphia have been equipped with magnesium oxide scrubbers to remove sulfur dioxide from their emissions. Burning low sulfur coal with up to a 90 percent scrubber removal capacity has resulted in low sulfur dioxide emissions.

Nitrogen Oxide

Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) systems have been installed at Eddystone and Cromby. They are expected to reduce NOx emissions between 25 and 40 percent. Combined with the installation of low NOx burners in the mid 1990s, the total NOx reduction at the plants is projected at 70 percent.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote