Quote:
Originally posted by hot_pastrami
I think most would agree that unless a person is wealthy enough to absorb liability costs themselves, it is immoral for that person to operate a motor vehicle on public roads without auto insurance. Therefore, a law exists to enforce that moral, requiring a person to have insurance in order to drive.
|
Well, I don't agree with that. The principle that no one should engage in an action which may impose more liability upon him than he can afford is not something I can accept.
Quote:
|
To make enforcing this law easier, and to help discourage uninsured mororists, the contract between the government and the driver dictates that the driver must carry proof of insurance in order to drive.
|
The acceptance of laws devised simply to make the police's job easier lead inevitably to a police state.