Quote:
Originally posted by russotto
Well, I don't agree with that. The principle that no one should engage in an action which may impose more liability upon him than he can afford is not something I can accept.
|
Are you referring to any activities in particular? If you are not able to afford whatever liabilities your actions may cause, who should bear the cost of your liability?
I would say that being able to afford whatever liabilities you cause amounts to being responsible for your actions. Do you disagree?
Quote:
|
The acceptance of laws devised simply to make the police's job easier lead inevitably to a police state.
|
Really. Inevitably? Do you disagree with pastrami's assertion that the law requiring drivers to carry proof of insurance is in place to make the enforcement of the insurance requirements easier, or do you think that having to carry proof of insurance is leading us on the path to a police state?