[Cyclefrance]

Like most studies, the authors/researchers will draw lines and set boundaries to their investigations, so its unclear what's in scope and what's outside, although it's pretty much a sure bet that the research falls short of putting a cost/value against the damage that the non-hybrid route means (contribution to rising sea levels and share of costs of defenses against same as a distant example). That's why it's is hard to believe any expert and the fact that so many of them can contradict each other ands still be right (omntheir own terms). Guess we will still probably go with the gut as to whether it feels right or not at the end of the day.