Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rtexanssane
laebedahs. Those experts may have made those statement 30 years ago, but if they have not retracted those statements sinse and are still standing by Laetrile, then that counts as current does it not.
You are completely ignoring the fact that these clinics exist all around the globe.
The Itallian you mentioned dismissed what was found in the US which he is entitled to do. America does not own the planet and the peer review is not the bible.
|
No, no it doesn't count as current. Do you even know what that word means? "occurring in or belonging to the present time". "Current" and "recent" are subjective words, this is true; however I'm sure everyone here can agree that 30 years is not anywhere near current or recent.
I don't think you fully absorbed what I said, so I'll point it out again, just in case you missed it: 'the Canadian doctor you quote in the second paragraph doesn't even mention Laetrile/B17/amygdalin at all! He simply says "treating cancer with nutrition". That's it.'
What about this doctor?