View Single Post
Old 04-29-2006, 03:57 PM   #63
rtexanssane
Wiseacre Emeritus
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 35
Fine pick on that one and ignore the other five if you want to. Thats what i mean by nit picking.
Yes the Scurvy vitamin C link is proven and accepted, but it took nearly 400 years despite the fact that the cure was known and documented in the early 1500's and not followed up.
My point is that the same attitudes that existed back then that stopped the cure becoming common knowledge is still present in science today.
The virus hunters just will not stop, they tried to find a virus for Scurvy, Pellagra, Beri Beri and even cancer research has tried to do the same to no avail.
The people who have posted here have connstantly made the kind of refferences to B17 as the medical authorities made back in the days of Jacques Cartier when they said that they were not interested in the witch doctor cures of ignorant savages which is exactly what you all seem to the the proponants of vitamin B17 are.
I tell you it has been proven but nobody with a career in medicine will touch or write about it because they will lose the respect of all their peers and any institution that works with it will be refused grants or have their funding pulled from under them. There is too much money involved in medicine now for most people to dare to take the risk.
Not to worry though we have had cancer for about 200 years, so humanity still has another 200 years to prove its any better than the Scurvy generations.
rtexanssane is offline   Reply With Quote