Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jinx
Did I miss the post where you provided any relavant information on the topic?
|
Which topic? there have been several in this thread.
My first post gave relevant information as to the legal status of children born in the US. I backed it up with the information that the hospital had confirmed that all of these children were
legally eligible to be aided.
Now, in a good debating forum, 'legal entitlement' would be accepted as an argument by those who use 'it's the law' as a justification. Unfortunately, one individual chose it as the cue to attack the messenger [again
] on the basis of his country of residence, rather than debate the issue. The option to shut up and walk away was not taken until the thread had morphed into a broad-ranging discussion with multiple sideshows.
Having proved my argument to the initial post early on in the thread, I invite jinx to specify which of the sideshows he/she would like me to provide relevant information on.