View Single Post
Old 05-24-2006, 04:38 AM   #12
Skunks
I thought I changed this.
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: western nowhere, ny
Posts: 412
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torrere
They're not sure how to get this working in humans yet. They're guessing that some humans also have cancer-destroying white blood cells (but you need to think of an ethical way to test for this). They've thought up a possible way to spread the benefits to humans, but they haven't tried it yet.

There's an established genetic connection. So solicit volunteers both from the non-cancerous public & current cancer patients. Non-cancerous volunteers would be screened for a family low on cancer, figuring that it's too early to tell what the specific nature of the gene is (I'm being vague here: someone with a better grasp of genetics could probably tell you how cancer-free the family would need to be to have the best chance of being cancer-immune without ruling out possibilities.) Then perform the "magic mouse blood cures cancer" test, subbing in the non-cancerous volunteer & the cancer patient accordingly.

Cancer is a disease with enough public support against it that rousing a massive amount of voluntary blood donations would be remarkably easy.

Although the whole idea of examining the non-cancerous members of society & looking for trends seems so obvious that I wonder what has come of it before.
Skunks is offline   Reply With Quote