Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Undertoad
Ah, so it's your definition of "automaton" that is really the root of the argument.
We could have avoided about 80 posts with clear reading?
|
I caught sarcasm in this post. Flints reply implied he concidered it at face value. The fact that we interpret things as we will since we have a free will to do so proves we are not automations.
plus,,,,dogs can't read. Is further proof. I can make this silly statement is further proof of my free will.