Quote:
|
Originally Posted by skysidhe
The fact that we interpret things as we will since we have a free will to do so proves we are not automations.
|
No it doesn't. If you and Flint both started at identical states, with identical brains and identical bodies, with identical upbringings, and read the statement in identical settings with identical states of mind, and
then interpreted it differently, that would be evidence against the automaton proposition.
The choice of the word automaton may not be optimal, as some people may take it to imply some sort of mass production, and therefore everyone acting the same. A better word may be
deterministic.