Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce
Different management.
The term, "Attack Helicopter" is misleading...... bordering on oxymoron. Elevated weapons platform would be more accurate.
The original design never was suitable for close cover, just stand off and shoot from a safe distance.
The longbow (recognized by the squashed globe mounted above the rotors) is an improved version that can target under much more adverse conditions and further away.
But that doesn't change the fact that helicopters don't endure flak as well as planes. It can't be done because the rotor blades which keep it in the air as well as propel it, are right out in harms way. There's no practical way to shield them and still work. They have to remain snipers.
aside...After years of nursing the A-10 fleet, duct tape and baling wiring them back together, and salvaging shot up junk because they were allowed to fix them, but not replace them..... somebody got their heads out of there butts, and approved an upgrade and refurbishment program. 'Bout time.  |
A-10's rock. Best damm attack aircraft in the sky. I have seen them in action and seen what they can take. As I recall rummy tried to have them retired. Now he is retired and they are still flying.
Someone please explain to me the purpose of posting an article about helo tactics and the weaknesses uncovered in an attack.