The Cellar - View Single Post

tw · 04-13-2007, 06:46 PM

Remember who Wolfowitz is. He originated and campaigned extensively for "Mission Accomplished". An agenda still strongly advocated by this administration's neocons in direct opposition to the Iraq Study Group. Wolfowitz today was caught again lying; this time about his letter to a Vice President for Human Resources. Of course. He is completely representative of those who believe "the message" justifies the means. Or as was argued back in Nam: the ends justifies the means.

Lying to kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqis to protect 'your' oil: acceptable. Lying to have the World Bank pay another $50,000 per year for Wolfowitz's sex: also acceptable especially when it is 'your' World Bank. Lying about a free and consensual blow job if you are a Democrat? Impeachable.

As so many military analysts have noted, 'the message' has even resulted in American soldier deaths. But then another righteous administration also had same contempt for 30,000 American soldiers in Nam.

Notice what constitutes 'morality' - a direct snub in the face of anyone who calls themselves religious and yet remains silent about these so moral administration officials - both recent and current.

I don't believe in morality. I believe those who advocate morality are the reason why the World Bank was paying an additional $50,000 per year for Wolfowitz's "nappy headed ho".

So where did they move her? Protected in the State Department to work for Wolfowitz's 'moral' peers. Why are the religious among us so silent? After all, Wolfwitz is what we once called the 'moral majority'.

Clinton did not pay for his sex. Wolfowitz did with the bank's money. Clinton confronts impeachment? Then Wolfowitz should be facing capital punishment. Oh. Wolfowitz is from the moral party. Therefore he should be punished less severely than Don Imus?

Funny. Don Imus exercised his 1st Amendment rights and gets punished far more severely. Wolfowitz's even overtly lied to kill hundred of thousands and make refugees of 4 million. Therefore he may not even suffer punishment as severe as Imus'? Justice has a double standard? Yes as long as your supporters are so 'moral'.

Moral to me is how the most hateful people justify their own crimes and protect their own at the expense of mankind. $50,000 annually to buy sex for Wolfowitz. As moral as a pedophile Catholic priest. Double standard.

04-13-2007, 06:46 PM	#528
tw Read? I only know how to write. Join Date: Jan 2001 Posts: 11,933	Remember who Wolfowitz is. He originated and campaigned extensively for "Mission Accomplished". An agenda still strongly advocated by this administration's neocons in direct opposition to the Iraq Study Group. Wolfowitz today was caught again lying; this time about his letter to a Vice President for Human Resources. Of course. He is completely representative of those who believe "the message" justifies the means. Or as was argued back in Nam: the ends justifies the means. Lying to kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqis to protect 'your' oil: acceptable. Lying to have the World Bank pay another $50,000 per year for Wolfowitz's sex: also acceptable especially when it is 'your' World Bank. Lying about a free and consensual blow job if you are a Democrat? Impeachable. As so many military analysts have noted, 'the message' has even resulted in American soldier deaths. But then another righteous administration also had same contempt for 30,000 American soldiers in Nam. Notice what constitutes 'morality' - a direct snub in the face of anyone who calls themselves religious and yet remains silent about these so moral administration officials - both recent and current. I don't believe in morality. I believe those who advocate morality are the reason why the World Bank was paying an additional $50,000 per year for Wolfowitz's "nappy headed ho". So where did they move her? Protected in the State Department to work for Wolfowitz's 'moral' peers. Why are the religious among us so silent? After all, Wolfwitz is what we once called the 'moral majority'. Clinton did not pay for his sex. Wolfowitz did with the bank's money. Clinton confronts impeachment? Then Wolfowitz should be facing capital punishment. Oh. Wolfowitz is from the moral party. Therefore he should be punished less severely than Don Imus? Funny. Don Imus exercised his 1st Amendment rights and gets punished far more severely. Wolfowitz's even overtly lied to kill hundred of thousands and make refugees of 4 million. Therefore he may not even suffer punishment as severe as Imus'? Justice has a double standard? Yes as long as your supporters are so 'moral'. Moral to me is how the most hateful people justify their own crimes and protect their own at the expense of mankind. $50,000 annually to buy sex for Wolfowitz. As moral as a pedophile Catholic priest. Double standard.