View Single Post
Old 04-20-2007, 02:21 PM   #289
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spexxvet
1. Seriously, follow it out to it's logical conclusion - ultimately, you have to kill someone to "protect yourself". Anything short of that leaves you unprotected. Got it?
You are not unprotected if you wound someone trying to kill you. So you are incorrect.

Quote:
And if you're not "protecting" yourself or a loved one, is it worth killing for?
Many people kill in the line of duty, police and military come to mind most quickly and I am sure that there are others, who may in the course of their duties in those capacities who may need to kill when they are neither "protecting themselves or loved ones", for example they may be protecting others.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote