View Single Post
Old 08-15-2007, 08:19 PM   #247
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigV View Post
[winging it]Hey, xoB, is the "doing" against the law? Or is it something more tangible, more definite, like possession?[/flying it into the ground]
That's an end run, you can do them without possessing them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
Because it is against the law. Personally i think it shouldn't be.

It's not an equivalent though, because this isn't about whether the state has a right to tell women what to do with their bodies (again, I think they should not), but rather empowering individual men with the right to make decisions about individual women's bodies.
No equivilent, Dana. I'm not getting into that silly proposal, just responding to Ali's reality.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Monkey View Post
Because some laws infringe on rights. In fact, according to you, all of them do.
God damn right they do.... every one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lumberjim View Post
bruce,

this analogy would work better if you were comparing it with someone compelling another person to do drugs.
Not an analogy, see above.
Quote:

When it comes down to personal liberty....we should be allowed to do whatever drugs we choose to.

Unfortunately, the reality of life means that those who do drugs also have to share reality with the rest of us. When those folks repeatedly fuck things up and cost innocent people things like THEIR lives, safety and money, then the lawmakers are compelled to take steps like regulating and outlawing the drugs that effect the drug users.
That's complete bullshit, considering how many people alcohol and tobacco kill.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote