Quote:
Originally posted by breavman
Just some questions: Why does the US government think it can decide for the iraqi people? Why hasn't it ever supported any internal movement against the dictator (more likely the contrary: remember north Iraq, 1988, and US helicopters?)? Why Saddam, whose military power was completely weakened, as it has been seen, instead of, for instance, Theodore Obiang, from Equator Guinea, whose people suffer as much as the iraqi people with Saddam?
|
It doesn't. /// Because they simply don't have enough power to make it cost effective. /// Because he's a convenient target that we can do something about.