[DanaC]

Originally Posted by rkzenrage

In no way was it an attack, it was an accurate description of what she was doing, rehashing a topic that had been previously exhausted, ad-naseum, previously in the thread... a thread she had not read. Yes, she had been invited, how does that precode reading it?

.

Wrong. A thread she had contributed to extensively. Also wrong, she wasn't invited, she was the one doing the inviting.

I stated dyslexia can occur in any intelligence range, clearly and concisely. Two posts later. You must have missed that one. Please, go check it out.

No I read it. I had responded to an earlier post in which you claimed dyslexia to be a disease of the intelligent. Your response was to attack me. My next few posts were tackling that attack.

I'm glad you are better at diagnosing me over the net than the professionals that have in person, more than once... you are truly skilled!

At what point have i attempted to diagnose you? I did not deny you were dyslexic at any point. I just took issue with your assertion that dyslexia is an indication of intelligence. I have taken on faith, because you have told me, that you are dyslexic. I recall you mentioning it once before, if memory serves. I am neither qualified, nor intending to become qualified, in diagnosing dyslexia. I have however, some training in how to teach literacy to dyslexic adults and in the process of that training i gained at least a modicum of an understanding of the condition.

Actually, you have returned and posted an extensive and factually incorrect attack.

I did not post an attack. I posted a rebuttal. At what point was my post factually incorrect? Generally speaking, board decorum would suggest that you cite the specific part of the post which you deem to be incorrect. Just pointing your finger at me and saying 'wrong' won't do.