Would there be a point? You wouldn't hear them, any more than you did when you pretended, several times, that the Swift Boaters hadn't been refuted.
Ah, well, what the heck. Here are a few.
1) You yourself impeached her on the issue of
evolution.
2) Her much vaunted "
footnotes" are full of inaccuracies, misleading representations, incomplete information, and quote mining.
3) She claimed, without source, that "
Everyone in Washington knew (Plame) was a CIA agent."
Plus, there are any number of jokes, exaggerations, insinuations, and mudslinging that are both inaccurate and misleading, but can be discounted by supporters as just jokes.