Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad
|
Learn from history. The summary of a 2003 NIE said Saddam definitively had WMDs. But the classified full text NIE said something completely different. Never forget what happened to reality when rewritten by White House lawyers. Why do you believe a declassified excerpted summary that is first vetted by whom?
Anything from the White House is automatically a lies until otherwise first proven by independent sources. Your NIE has no credibility as demonstrated previously in 2003. George Jr's administration routinely justifies lies by their political agenda.
Your NIE is in direct contradiction to too many other and far more trustworthy sources. First, you must prove that the White House did not subvert the NIE. Why? This administration has a long history of being that corrupt - even rewriting science to fit their political agendas.
Let's see. The science repeatedly demonstrated there was no proof of Saddam's WMDs. So why did the NIE say otherwise. Deja vue WMDs. How often do we ignore these lessons from history?
This is George Jr. Anything from this adminstration is a lie until proven otherwise. A fact so well proven in these part seven year history.