[Radar]

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

Bosh, top to bottom. A schmuck you began, and a schmuck you remain. I say again you can't really be a libertarian unless you are also a determined liberationists.

I consider it a badge of honor to be called a schmuck from such a dishonest, idiotic, douche bag like you. Of course you repeat the same tired lie that you always do..."can't really be a libertarian unless you are also a determined liberationists". I've proven you wrong so many times, I can do it while I'm sleeping. Your claims violate every single libertarian principle ever documented or espoused by those who created the libertarian party, and who first created libertarian philosophy. They also violate the Constitution and the wishes of our America's founders.

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

You can't present a convincing argument otherwise. Dead fascists don't amount, after all, to an obstacle to creating a more libertarian social order, do they?

Every argument I've ever made on the subject is truthful, factual, well-documented, and convincing to any honest person that has an education above that of a 2nd grader. This is why I've failed to convince you. Or perhaps you can't hear my arguments with your head buried so far up your own ass?

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

Attract women? So you say -- on the 'net.

Well, unlike you I don't have a credit card statement to prove who I went on "dates" with. Unlike you, my word is valuable. I've been with plenty of American women, but that isn't my preference. If you like them, great. All you've got to do is grow a brain, get a job, erase everything about your vile personality, go to charm school, try not to be such a dickhead, and maybe you can convince a desperate, old, used-up biker chick to take you.

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

You remove obstacles to libertarianism by force, for the obstacles will act to oppose libertarianism by force, and unless there is countervailing force, they will invariably succeed in quashing it. Hence, no libertarianism. This is where your idea prevents libertarianism's spread, and ought therefore not to be taken for action. Your regrettable intellect avoids understanding this, as you so often avoid understanding in general.

Libertarianism is the philosophy that you don't initiate force. Libertarians believe the only justifiable use of force is in your own defense. You don't use force to spread libertarianism. Using force to spread libertarianism is like using rape to spread chastity. Your lack of intellect would be an embarrassment for a 4 year old retarded kid who was hit in the head with a sledge hammer. But this is nothing compared to your lack of character or integrity.

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

Nondemocracies are the places that would benefit most greatly from going libertarian or in a libertarian direction -- the likelier occurrence, as societies change their political orders only gradually in any circumstance other than badly losing a war.

Democracy is not freedom and is not libertarianism and libertarianism is not spread by force. You fail to grasp even the most basic component of libertarianism. This is why you regurgitate lies and make absurd statements so consistently. It's why you will always be laughed at by real libertarians.

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

Most of the human obstacles to libertarianism will become obstacles through warfare and thuggery.

Correct. And you are one of those obstacles. You are exactly the kind of cheap, petty, brainless little thug you are talking about.

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

I am prepared to neutralize these strategies; you can't do that. I recommend you get the hell out of the way of those who can.

I recommend you go fuck yourself and don't every try to use MY military to pull off your stupidity and stop trying to label your brand of tyranny as libertarianism, because it's not. If you want to go on your own to help people win freedom for themselves, more power to you. If you try to use the U.S. Military to do it, I will stand in your way, and I'm a lot tougher than you are.

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

You will note, now that you go back and check, that I did not claim libertarian thinking for Churchill: just wisdom. You shouldn't try having your very own facts yourself.

I didn't accuse you of lying about Churchill being a libertarian. You've only lied about yourself being one. I merely said that Churchill isn't a libertarian and if you are trying to use his words to suggest that you are one, you're barking up the wrong tree....as usual.