The Cellar - View Single Post

Beestie · 09-11-2003, 07:30 AM

I disagree with the New York Times assertion that we have used up all the good will the world extended to us. They just made that up. Remember, at the New York Times, hypothesese are considered conclusions. And since we're bringing up Hitler quotes, I'll give you another one that the New York Times seems to have adopted as a mantra: "The people will believe a big lie before they will believe a small one."

The world staunchly supports the United States and George W. Bush. I suppose we could appease a lot of stateside liberals by bending over, pointing to our behind and begging terrorists across the globe "thank you sir, may I have another" or we could go kick the living $hit out of anyone and everyone remotely connected to 9/11 or the threat of another 9/11.

Let me ask the liberal pussys at the New York Times which price they would rather pay: the cost associated with the alleged loss of support from soccer moms across the planet or the cost associated with not taking the war on terror to our enemies' back yard?

Do you think (rhetorical question) that our enemies fear us more now, or before 9/11 when they were calling us "paper tigers?"

No one who ever ran away from a war ever won a war. Anyone here not think that we are at war with Al Queda?

09-11-2003, 07:30 AM	#5
Beestie -◊\|≡·∙■·∙≡\|◊- Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Parts unknown. Posts: 4,081	I disagree with the New York Times assertion that we have used up all the good will the world extended to us. They just made that up. Remember, at the New York Times, hypothesese are considered conclusions. And since we're bringing up Hitler quotes, I'll give you another one that the New York Times seems to have adopted as a mantra: "The people will believe a big lie before they will believe a small one." The world staunchly supports the United States and George W. Bush. I suppose we could appease a lot of stateside liberals by bending over, pointing to our behind and begging terrorists across the globe "thank you sir, may I have another" or we could go kick the living $hit out of anyone and everyone remotely connected to 9/11 or the threat of another 9/11. Let me ask the liberal pussys at the New York Times which price they would rather pay: the cost associated with the alleged loss of support from soccer moms across the planet or the cost associated with not taking the war on terror to our enemies' back yard? Do you think (rhetorical question) that our enemies fear us more now, or before 9/11 when they were calling us "paper tigers?" No one who ever ran away from a war ever won a war. Anyone here not think that we are at war with Al Queda? __________________ ♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ Last edited by Beestie; 09-11-2003 at 08:19 AM.