"freedom of choice"
i think the two words, 'freedom' and 'choice', exclude one another
if you follow my postings in this thread, i equate the individual and choice...i believe them equivalent, synonymous
that is: to BE an individual one must choose, and to choose one must BE an individual
if 'freedom' is a fiction, a fiction most often offered up as privilege to the governed by the governors, then it can't have anything to do with 'choice' since 'choice' is integral to the individual who exercises it
that is: 'choice' can't be taken away from the agent, nor can it be granted to the agent by another
so: 'freedom of choice' is an error...in my opinion... --henry
__________________
like the other guy sez: 'not really back, blah-blah-blah...'
|