Quote:
Originally posted by OnyxCougar
Let me rephrase.
|
That isn't rephrasing, that's redefining. That's using a definition that no scientist would recognise, let alone accept. But if we use that shorthand, then of course all of that isn't fact, as I stated before.
Evolution, the change of species over time, is an observed fact, verified experimentally.
Natural selection, or "
bacterial and other microorganisms ... evolved and changed enough to create aquatic lifeforms, which evolved to amphibians, which evolved to whatever, to whatever, ad infinitem, basically life, as we know it" is a theory explaining an evolutionary process, not a fact, but is a theory based on available evidence.
Abiogenesis, or "creation of amino acids and other enzymes in a "primordial soup" from whence bacterial and other microorganisms spontaneously occured"
creation of amino acids and other enzymes in a "primordial soup" from whence bacterial and other microorganisms spontaneously occured is likewise a theory. Experiments verify the aminos and enzymes, but no life has been experimentally created.
The big bang theory is also a theory. New data is always coming in, which causes the theory to be adjusted.
THAT is not provable. Therefore it is NOT a fact. Period.
Nothing is provable in science. Only disprovable. And when I pointed out the distinction between evolution and natural selection in the other post, I stated that the natural selection part was not a fact. So obviously evolution + natural selection + abiogenesis + big bang is not a fact.
Quote:
|
Therefore, if you BELIEVE there is NO god, (which not believing in any god is) then you have faith there is no God.
|
There's a difference between not believing in any god, and believing there is no God. The former implies no faith, the latter implies faith.