The Cellar - View Single Post

xoxoxoBruce · 10-18-2009, 01:12 PM

I stand by that statement 100%, always have. Deciding how to do that, we have to weigh the cost benefit ratio, and in many cases we don't know what that is. I'm not suggesting every project must have a direct monetary payback, but to try and weed out outrageous waste. So, while attempting to accomplish conservation and cleanliness, the investigation and debate about how we interact with the earth/climate, and it's effect, should continue.
There will probably always be more we don't know, than we do know. More knowledge is gooder.

10-18-2009, 01:12 PM	#325
xoxoxoBruce The future is unwritten Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 71,105	I stand by that statement 100%, always have. Deciding how to do that, we have to weigh the cost benefit ratio, and in many cases we don't know what that is. I'm not suggesting every project must have a direct monetary payback, but to try and weed out outrageous waste. So, while attempting to accomplish conservation and cleanliness, the investigation and debate about how we interact with the earth/climate, and it's effect, should continue. There will probably always be more we don't know, than we do know. More knowledge is gooder. __________________ The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.