The Cellar - View Single Post

russotto · 03-08-2001, 07:21 PM

I'm not going to argue with tw point by point.

But here's the kind of thing that's next if routine, unwarranted surveillance in other-than-visible parts of the EM spectrum are upheld:

http://www.millivision.com/partners.html

The courts have held that if the cops can see in your window from the street, what they see is admissable without a warrant. But if they have to use binoculars or a telescope to do so, it's not admissable. Use of IR imaging is no different than use of a telescope in that respect, IMO.

03-08-2001, 07:21 PM	#20
russotto Professor Join Date: Jan 2001 Posts: 1,788	What's next if IR imaging upheld I'm not going to argue with tw point by point. But here's the kind of thing that's next if routine, unwarranted surveillance in other-than-visible parts of the EM spectrum are upheld: http://www.millivision.com/partners.html The courts have held that if the cops can see in your window from the street, what they see is admissable without a warrant. But if they have to use binoculars or a telescope to do so, it's not admissable. Use of IR imaging is no different than use of a telescope in that respect, IMO.