Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman
Not really - the basic raw data needs to be fucked with and thats about it.
|
Yes, it is a conspiracy if you believe all the raw data has been fucked with. It doesn't come from a single source, but multiple ones.
Quote:
|
Opinions are like assholes ...
|
Point taken.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jinx
Raw data? In that article full of boo-hooing and political rock throwing ("it's the right-winger's fault, they're suck jerkheads!")
Saying there's 15 ways to prove the earth is getting warmer and that the cause is 'almost certainly' humans isn't raw data.
|
Yes, it was a quote but it pointed to the fact that there are loads of raw data that still supports climate change. That is a strong argument. One just has to look at the IPCC to see that.
BTW, what is a strong argument against the IPCC? All I've seen are argument flaws and trying to disprove a single person from the entire panel.