Quote:
Originally Posted by glatt
Nice qualifier there. I didn't read the Faux News article, for obvious reasons, but you have to admit that he only has to not mention it one time out of a thousand, and they can still make this accusation. "well, he may have disclosed it, but he wasn't consistent."
|
Eh... If you are speaking as an economist for your views then you have a professional obligation to say your are on the payroll. Just because it comes from Fox does not change the facts.
Wasn't there some blow up a few years ago over so called "reporters" who were on the White House payroll supporting their policy in news print is a supposed "un-biased" roll?