Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman
The overwhelming consensus in the '70's was the exact opposite.
|
Tsonis is cited only because his paper (that proves nothing about global cooling) somehow supports myths and lies from a political agenda. Classicman again invents a lie to prove a political agenda. Overwhelming consensus was not global cooling. I was there when Firestone was intentionally killing people and the victims were blamed for being killed by aluminum wire. Wackos will even rewrite that history to prove a point.
Overwhelming consensus was air pollution so massive as to threaten to mankind. That consensus was correct. So we innovated. Addressed and solved that problem. Wackos opposes solutions at every step. Innovation and the advancement of mankind is not found in preachings from Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, and that political agenda.
A consensus proved mankind was destroying the ozone layer. So wackos invented science to dispute that reality. Science is a threat to their political agenda - which is why White House lawyers must rewrite science papers. Wackos will not apologize for perverting science. That would expose their objective: extremism. Meanwhile, innovation is solving an ozone depletion problem before a disaster ensues.
Wackos opposed auto mileage standards using lies and myths. Even blamed liberals for having us all driving Pintos. When will extremists apologize for that lie? Meanwhile American patriots are why full size Accords and Camrays do 30 MPG.
The overwhelming consensus from those who use facts, numbers, and reality to learn: global warming is a manmade problem. A problem so easily solved when we address reasons for that problem. Ten gallons of gasoline burned. Over eight do nothing but create heat and global warming gases. Well over eight of ten gallons totally wasted. Extremist call this good. Even wrote a political paper saying we must unilaterally attack (“Pearl Harbor) other nations to "protect our oil". When do they apologize for that lie?
Wackos promoted hydrogen as a solution. A political agenda inventing facts to pervert and distort reality. Extremist hate doing hard work; to learn science and reality. Easier to regurgitate political myths, soundbytes, and lies.
Tsonis’ paper is about non-linear math as demonstrated in his simulator. An unproven simulator predicted global cooling. That becomes 100% proof of global cooling – when the political agenda is more important that reality and science? How ironic. Extremists used same reasoning to prove Saddam had WMDs and that Saddam was planning to attack America. When do extremists apologize for that lie?
Another lie – a mythical overwhelming consensus of global cooling. Reading news every day back then - nobody discussed global cooling. When do extremist apologize for that lie? Lies for a political agenda. No different from what Hitler did to prove Jews as evil.
Why must White House lawyers rewrite science papers? When do extremists apologize for that lie? What is good for a their political agenda is good for science? An underlying reasoning in classicman’s global cooling claims.
Classicman is what doing extremists did to deny 1960 air pollution, ozone depletion, safety equipment in cars, blame the unions, blame the Japanese, stifle stem cell research, and invent Saddam’s WMDs. When do extremists apologize for intentionally lying about Saddam’s WMDs and intent to attack America? Oh. Invading other nations to protect “our oil” is even justified? Mission Accomplished.
That Tsonis paper does nothing to prove global cooling. Global cooling claims are invented by extremists such as Limbaugh and Beck. They must be right … now that White House lawyers are no longer rewriting science papers. Extremsist will not even apologize for inventing Saddam’s WMDs and the 4,500 American serviceman they had killed.
Multiple myths about global cooling are posted. Extremists will even distort what Tsonis’ paper says to promote their agenda. So we are all driving Pintos? The term extremist paraphrases the word liar. People who cannot bother to first learn facts, numbers, or even simple science. Extremists so dumb as to even advocate hydrogen as a fuel – now invent myths about global cooling.
How many times must they lie before the conclusion is automatic: global cooling is just another lie. How many Jews had to die because so many believed the exact same propaganda techniques. The overwhelming consensus should be that classicman has intentionally and overtly posted more lies - in the tradition of extremism.
Happy Monkey is 100% correct.