Quote:
Originally Posted by Pie
WTF was Kennedy thinking???
|
"Was that a gunshot?"
Quote:
Originally Posted by squirell nutkin
WILL reshape politics? What, did you write this thread 200 years ago and just now got around to hitting "Post Quick Reply"?
|
What he said!
Quote:
Originally Posted by glatt
Does this new ruling mean that multinational corporations can now pump money into the US elections by using their US branch? Are we going to have Chinese corporations donating money to US candidates by using dummy US subsidiaries?
|
Well, maybe they're just trying to even out the balance of trade figures. Gotta get some kind of money coming in.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Monkey
Any limits to donating directly to candidates (I don't know specifics on this, it may not even be legal at all) would be per-corporation.
But there will be no limit to the corporation making its own ad campaign, completely separately (wink wink nudge nudge) from the candidate's campaign.
|
Stand by for third party attack ads. "Candidate Smith denied any knowledge of the ads which portrayed Jones as a lying cheating pedophile communist atheist...."
Planetologists talk of "crater saturation". The moon, for example, is so pitted with craters that any more impacts don't make a noticable scar; it is crater saturated. The only positive thought I have is that maybe Washington is already slush-money saturated. While not good, this might not make much difference.
Good luck guys.