Quote:
Originally Posted by ZenGum
Okay, if you stipulate all three must be male, that narrows it down, but if you allow two children per generation that puts is back up. And in older generations the average number was higher.
My high school mate shares his birthday with his daughter.
I reckon Pie knows this already, but ... how many people do you think you would need in a group to give a 50% or more chance that two people share a birthday?
|
I completely suck at math. Like, my math could suck a trigonometry textbook through 50 feet of garden hose. But I guess at the most extreme you'd need 366 people to assure that there would be one duplicate birthday. (excluding a Feb29th)
But, and this is a complete I suck at math guess, if you only needed a 50/50 chance, couldn't you divide 366 by 2 and get something like 183?
But again, while I rock at geometry which isn't really math, I had to take college algebra three times to get a D.
Did I mention I suck at math?