Quote:
Originally posted by juju
Well, the difference is that non-human animals can't consent to sex or marriage. A man <i>can</i> consent to sex with another man.
I suppose the question really is: Do you believe there are enough bad consequences to gay marriage that their consent should be overruled?
|
yeah. i do.
okay...before anyone BLASTS me for stereotyping, i'm only writing from what i know. of my MANY gay friends, i have only met one couple who was interested in being a couple -- that is, only the two of them. they have been together 30 years, and are as married as any hetero couple i know.
that being said, every other gay man-man couple i've known were interested in short term. inevitably, one or both were sleeping with other people. that's NOT the case in most hetero couples i've met, although, again, some....
okay. so marriage is all about benefits. and it seems to me, that in any infidelity issue, you run all kinds of risks....lawyers for divorces. suits tying up courtrooms. medical benefit expenses...from stds or related issues.
so in the cases *I've* seen......... i would think that these particular gay men would treat marriage lightly..and cause legal hassles.