Well this is how the problem moves. When Thimerosal is suggested as a problem, it's a disaster; when it's devalued, there are problems with the studies; when it's shown to be irrelevant, it's an "individual component".
Why must the argument move so? What does that say about the argument?
*
kisses* (11/1/09)
Two months later, Desiree was "outed" in the final video.
She is an individual case. Yup. That's what she was when you
first posted her first video as a scary case of vaccine injury... and I watched it, and I thought to myself, "BULLSHIT, THIS RINGS FALSE TO ME".
And that's why I followed it so closely; and for the next few months we went over her and over her, until
your last word on Desiree was (11/21/09):
Quote:
|
My life experiences indicate to me that her experience is a credible one. Yours indicates to you that it is not. But you must admit that you do not have experiences to indicate that hers is false--you don't know anyone with dystonia who has been unable to improve with these treatments. You simply lack any corroborating experiences.
|
You can see why I pursued it so hard. You can see why I had to bring it back, after all this time. You said I lack corroborating life experiences. I say that corroborating life experiences are not what is needed to fuel the bullshit detector.