1) I didn't say I wanted to have that argument, I was simply saying you were sending any possible discussion down the wrong path by incorrectly framing the issue.
2)
Quote:
|
The Republican plan will cost more than $3 trillion in lost revenue from the tax cuts
|
This. Cost who? The government? It isn't their money until they take it from us. The taxpayers. So you can flip that statement on its head and say the "Democrat plan will cost taxpayers more than $3 trillion in confiscated wages". Again a ridiculous way to cast the issue in a partisan light, but it's all in how you frame the issue, right?