That would scare the crap out of me.
Oh, and that graph? I hate its disingenuousness. disingenuous-ness? The relationship between the length of the line (years) is on a different scale from the height (dollars). Although there are 10 years and 10 ten thousand dollar increments, the ratios are different. The way the graph is drawn makes the cost increase seem more dramatic than it is.
And it takes one cost and doesn't compare it to other economic factors, like inflation. It's meaningless.
College education these days is pretty piss poor and that could be a whole 'nother thread. I taught a college for "dumb poor kids" and a friend of mine taught at a college for "dumb rich kids."
My wife taught for years at Fordham, a fairly respectable school, and she'd tell me about her students who would say they missed class because they had the 'flew.'
The graph should look more like this:
__________________
The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs
Last edited by footfootfoot; 02-10-2013 at 09:05 PM.
|