View Single Post
Old 01-12-2002, 11:50 AM   #39
dave
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by ladysycamore
Oh, but he was a member of the armed services: he could possibly be a threat to national security. He was just..."troubled". How about we just single out that Arab or Sikh Indian instead? It's MUCH easier, donchaknow.
NO.

He was <b>REPEATEDLY</b> called a terrorist. The Oklahoma City Bombing has been called, by even major news outlets, "the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil" - but the last day anyone ever said that was September 10th.

You're twisting facts here to add to your argument - that's called "spin", and that's okay. The problem is that they're not really facts. McVeigh has been called a terrorist. He was a terrorist. He used terror to get his message across. No one ever said he wasn't.
  Reply With Quote