The tenth digit

HungLikeJesus · 03-18-2008, 04:43 PM

How many of you are comfortable with our current counting system? You know, 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10, etc.

This is something that's been drilled into us for so long that it seems normal, natural, not to be questioned. And what's wrong with that?

Here's an example. Get a sharpie, or other permanent marker. Starting with the pinkie of the left hand, number each of your fingers, including the thumbs. Left pinkie - 1. Left ring finger - 2. And so on. Left thumb - 5, right thumb - 6...

What happens when you get to your right pinkie? Right pinkie is 10 - that takes two digits! It's just not right.

There are other problems with the number 10, and its multiples. For example, most people think that 20 is the bottom of the twenty series. It's not - it's the top of the teens. And 30 is the top of the twenties. It's crazy. But what can we do?

I would suggest that we adopt a single digit representing 10. What will we call it? How about ten? What should it look like? Maybe this: þ. It's like a 1 and 0 combined into one digit.

With the new digit þ we can almost completely eliminate use of the dreaded zero (but not completely).

Counting in new digit is almost the same as counting in old digit:
1,2,...,9,þ, 11, 12, ... ,19,1þ (tenteen), 21, ..., 29, 2þ (twenty-ten), 31

Counting in old digit, we have 9 one-digit numbers, 90 2-digit numbers, 900 3-digit numbers, etc.

Counting in new digit, we will have 10 1-digit numbers, 100 2-digit numbers (from 11 to þþ), and so on.

Doesn't that just feel right?

Rather than present derivation of decimals and negative numbers, I'll leave those as exercises for the reader.

Flint · 03-18-2008, 05:09 PM

I think of the first ten digits as 0 through 9, with 9 being the 10th single-digit number.

But this does remind me of something that bothers me: Sunday is the END of the week. NOT the beginning. Monday morning, when you clock in at work, is the beginning of the week for most people. Sunday is the last day in the weekend, which is the very last part of the week. Monday begins the next week. . . . It's stupid to have calendars arranged with Sunday as the beginning of the week.

HungLikeJesus · 03-27-2008, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint

I think of the first ten digits as 0 through 9, with 9 being the 10th single-digit number.

But this does remind me of something that bothers me: Sunday is the END of the week. NOT the beginning. Monday morning, when you clock in at work, is the beginning of the week for most people. Sunday is the last day in the weekend, which is the very last part of the week. Monday begins the next week. . . . It's stupid to have calendars arranged with Sunday as the beginning of the week.

If you go to your User CP and select "Edit Options" / "Date and Time Options" you can set the start of the week to any day you like.

I have mine set for Wednesday.

Pete Zicato · 10-25-2010, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint

But this does remind me of something that bothers me: Sunday is the END of the week. NOT the beginning. Monday morning, when you clock in at work, is the beginning of the week for most people. Sunday is the last day in the weekend, which is the very last part of the week. Monday begins the next week. . . . It's stupid to have calendars arranged with Sunday as the beginning of the week.

The calendars I actually use (and, I bet, the calendars you actually use) have an option to set the first day of the week.

You're ranting about an obsolete technology (paper calendars).

Flint · 10-25-2010, 01:28 PM

Your face is an obsolete technology.

Pete Zicato · 10-25-2010, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint

Your face is an obsolete technology.

Your dick is a null pointer.

SteveDallas · 03-18-2008, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HungLikeJesus

It's just not right. . . It's crazy.

Speak for yourself. I can calculate in any base you care to name. Our current system for representing numbers* with numerals* according to place values is flexible enough to accommodate this. Are the numerals customarily used to represent individual digits arbitrary? Of course. Duh.

What comes after 9þ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by HungLikeJesus

Rather than present derivation of decimals and negative numbers, I'll leave those as exercises for the reader.

No, I want to see you do decimals.

*Yes, there's a difference between numbers and numerals.

Flint · 03-18-2008, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveDallas

Are the numerals customarily used to represent individual digits arbitrary?

No. We have ten clumps of neurons that represent the ten digits. They study stroke and brain injury patients to see what they "lose" when certain parts of the brain are damaged. The ten digits reside just above and slightly behind your ear.

HungLikeJesus · 03-18-2008, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveDallas

Speak for yourself. I can calculate in any base you care to name. Our current system for representing numbers* with numerals* according to place values is flexible enough to accommodate this. Are the numerals customarily used to represent individual digits arbitrary? Of course. Duh.

What comes after 9þ?

No, I want to see you do decimals.

*Yes, there's a difference between numbers and numerals.

Logically, after 9þ (ninety-ten) comes þ1 (tenty-one).

Decimals are a lot of fun, and the representation changes depending on degree of accuracy indicated (i.e. number of significant figures).

1.5 is still 1.5, but 1.50 becomes 1.4þ and 1.500 becomes 1.49þ

In this way, we know that we really mean three or four significant figures, and are not just writing down what the calculator or spreadsheet gives us (I see this error all the time). Of course, there's still plenty of room for human error.

SteveDallas · 03-18-2008, 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HungLikeJesus

Logically, after 9þ (ninety-ten) comes þ1 (tenty-one).

What comes after þþ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by HungLikeJesus

Decimals are a lot of fun, and the representation changes depending on degree of accuracy indicated (i.e. number of significant figures).

1.5 is still 1.5, but 1.50 becomes 1.4þ and 1.500 becomes 1.49þ

In this way, we know that we really mean three or four significant figures, and are not just writing down what the calculator or spreadsheet gives us (I see this error all the time). Of course, there's still plenty of room for human error.

I'm speechless. Help me out here, what's 0.1? 0.01?

Why does the concept of zero bother you so much?

HungLikeJesus · 03-18-2008, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveDallas

What comes after þþ?

I'm speechless. Help me out here, what's 0.1? 0.01?

Why does the concept of zero bother you so much?

After þþ comes 111.

0.01 is still 0.01, and so on. We still need zero.

What, then, is 1.01? (think of 101/100 to get the correct answer)

SteveDallas · 03-18-2008, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HungLikeJesus

0.01 is still 0.01, and so on. We still need zero.

Bullshit. You've gone to positively pathological lengths to get rid of zero on the left side of the decimal. Let's see some consistency.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HungLikeJesus

What, then, is 1.01? (think of 101/100 to get the correct answer)

You just said .01 is .01, so 1 plus .01 is 1.01. (Unless you're going to define the addition operation differently than usual.)

HungLikeJesus · 03-18-2008, 05:14 PM

But you wouldn't count something beginning with zero, would you? You always start with one.

Flint · 03-18-2008, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HungLikeJesus

But you wouldn't count something beginning with zero, would you?

Yes, I would. My workstations, servers, the drives in my tape libraries, etc. all begin their respective naming conventions with device zero.

HungLikeJesus · 03-18-2008, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint

Yes, I would. My workstations, servers, the drives in my tape libraries, etc. all begin their respective naming conventions with device zero.

So your first child is really child number zero?

03-18-2008, 04:43 PM	#1
HungLikeJesus Only looks like a disaster tourist Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: above 7,000 feet Posts: 7,208	The tenth digit How many of you are comfortable with our current counting system? You know, 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10, etc. This is something that's been drilled into us for so long that it seems normal, natural, not to be questioned. And what's wrong with that? Here's an example. Get a sharpie, or other permanent marker. Starting with the pinkie of the left hand, number each of your fingers, including the thumbs. Left pinkie - 1. Left ring finger - 2. And so on. Left thumb - 5, right thumb - 6... What happens when you get to your right pinkie? Right pinkie is 10 - that takes two digits! It's just not right. There are other problems with the number 10, and its multiples. For example, most people think that 20 is the bottom of the twenty series. It's not - it's the top of the teens. And 30 is the top of the twenties. It's crazy. But what can we do? I would suggest that we adopt a single digit representing 10. What will we call it? How about ten? What should it look like? Maybe this: þ. It's like a 1 and 0 combined into one digit. With the new digit þ we can almost completely eliminate use of the dreaded zero (but not completely). Counting in new digit is almost the same as counting in old digit: 1,2,...,9,þ, 11, 12, ... ,19,1þ (tenteen), 21, ..., 29, 2þ (twenty-ten), 31 Counting in old digit, we have 9 one-digit numbers, 90 2-digit numbers, 900 3-digit numbers, etc. Counting in new digit, we will have 10 1-digit numbers, 100 2-digit numbers (from 11 to þþ), and so on. Doesn't that just feel right? Rather than present derivation of decimals and negative numbers, I'll leave those as exercises for the reader. __________________ Keep Your Bodies Off My Lawn SteveDallas's Random Thread Picker.

03-18-2008, 05:09 PM	#2
Flint Snowflake Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Dystopia Posts: 13,136	I think of the first ten digits as 0 through 9, with 9 being the 10th single-digit number. But this does remind me of something that bothers me: Sunday is the END of the week. NOT the beginning. Monday morning, when you clock in at work, is the beginning of the week for most people. Sunday is the last day in the weekend, which is the very last part of the week. Monday begins the next week. . . . It's stupid to have calendars arranged with Sunday as the beginning of the week. __________________ **************** There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio**

10-25-2010, 01:28 PM	#5
Flint Snowflake Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Dystopia Posts: 13,136	Your face is an obsolete technology. __________________ **************** There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio**

03-18-2008, 05:14 PM	#13
HungLikeJesus Only looks like a disaster tourist Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: above 7,000 feet Posts: 7,208	But you wouldn't count something beginning with zero, would you? You always start with one. __________________ Keep Your Bodies Off My Lawn SteveDallas's Random Thread Picker.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)